Design Decisions

Every component in ForgeUI is the result of deliberate trade-offs.

These decisions are not accidental, nor are they purely aesthetic.
They reflect a consistent philosophy about how UI systems should behave as products and teams grow.

This page documents some of those decisions so you understand why things are structured the way they are — and when it makes sense to diverge.

---

Fewer props, more structure

ForgeUI components intentionally expose fewer props than most UI kits.

Instead of offering endless configuration, components encourage:

• composition
• extension
• local overrides

This approach keeps APIs smaller and easier to reason about.

Rather than encoding every possible variation into a single component, ForgeUI favors building blocks that can be combined in predictable ways.

---

Stability over flexibility

Highly configurable components tend to change frequently.

As new use cases appear:

• props get added
• defaults get tweaked
• edge cases multiply

Over time, this leads to fragile APIs and unexpected behavior.

ForgeUI trades some flexibility for long-term stability, allowing components to remain usable without constant refactoring.

---

Composition as the primary extension mechanism

Composition is the preferred way to extend ForgeUI components.

Instead of:

• toggling flags
• passing large configuration objects
• enabling conditional behavior through props

ForgeUI encourages:

• wrapping components
• layering additional behavior
• composing smaller primitives into larger patterns

This keeps extension logic close to where it is used and avoids centralizing complexity.

---

Styling in markup

Styles in ForgeUI live close to the markup using Tailwind utility classes.

This approach avoids:

• hidden styling layers
• indirection through theme objects
• global overrides that are hard to trace

The cost is more verbose JSX.
The benefit is clarity and traceability.

When a visual issue appears, the relevant styles are usually visible in the same file.

---

Avoiding implicit styling behavior

ForgeUI avoids implicit styling rules that are applied indirectly through configuration.

Implicit behavior:

• makes debugging harder
• obscures visual intent
• increases onboarding time for new contributors

By keeping styles explicit, ForgeUI makes it easier to:

• understand layout decisions
• audit visual changes
• reason about responsive behavior

---

Conservative defaults

ForgeUI components ship with conservative defaults.

Defaults are chosen to:

• work in most contexts
• avoid visual surprises
• degrade gracefully under edge cases

Teams are encouraged to adapt components to their needs rather than rely on aggressive built-in styling.

---

Avoiding abstraction leakage

Abstraction leakage occurs when implementation details bleed into the public API.

ForgeUI works to minimize this by:

• keeping component responsibilities narrow
• avoiding deep dependency chains
• preferring explicit composition over implicit behavior

When abstractions leak, components become harder to use correctly and harder to evolve safely.

---

Accepting trade-offs explicitly

Not every decision in ForgeUI is universally optimal.

Some trade-offs include:

• more verbose markup
• fewer built-in variations
• more responsibility placed on the implementer

These trade-offs are intentional.

Understanding these decisions makes it easier to work with the system rather than against it.

---

When to diverge from ForgeUI patterns

ForgeUI is not a rigid framework.

It is acceptable to diverge when:

• product requirements demand it
• constraints differ significantly
• a simpler solution is clearly better

The goal is not blind adherence, but informed decision-making.

ForgeUI provides a strong baseline.
Teams are expected to adapt it thoughtfully rather than follow it dogmatically.

---

Final thought

Design decisions shape how systems age.

ForgeUI’s structure reflects a belief that:

• clarity compounds
• constraints enable scale
• systems should earn complexity, not assume it